Woman convicted for domestic terrorism against BNSF

[TBird1958]

Something of interest that popped up in my local news feed today, the article is from the Bellingham, WA Herald.



Bellingham woman convicted in federal court of placing train shunt in late November

Denver Pratt, The Bellingham Herald (Bellingham, Wash.) 1 hr ago

Comments

|




Sep. 9—A 28-year-old Bellingham woman was convicted Thursday in federal court for her role in placing a shunt along the railroad tracks near Bellingham to disrupt BNSF Railway train safety features in late November.





A jury deliberated for roughly three hours after a two-day trial before convicting Ellen Brennan Reiche for violence against a railroad carrier in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Washington in Seattle, according to a Thursday U.S. Department of Justice press release.



Reiche faces up to 20 years in prison, and her sentencing is scheduled for Dec. 17, according to the release.



Reiche was one of two people arrested on Nov. 28, 2020 for placing a shunt north of Bellingham north of the railroad intersection with Cliffside Drive. Samantha Frances Brooks also was arrested and indicted for one count of terrorist attacks and other violence against a railroad carrier, according to federal court records.



Brooks pleaded guilty to those charges July 9, and a federal judge accepted her guilty plea July 26. Brooks also faces up to 20 years in prison, according to the release, and her sentencing is set for Oct. 8.



Shunts consist of a wire stretched between and connected to the rails of the track to mimic the electrical signal of a train on the track, according to previous reporting in The Bellingham Herald. Sensing trains, safety systems prevent trains from entering the area until the shunt has been located and removed.



The placement of shunts also can cause safety hazards by interfering with the operation of crossing gates at intersections with roadways and can cause gates to allow vehicle traffic to cross tracks, even with a train approaching, court records state. Shunts can also cause the automatic braking system on trains — known as Positive Train Control — to engage, which can cause decoupling of cars or a derailment, federal records show.



The arrests



In late November, BNSF police received a motion alert from a game camera placed along track just north of Bellingham, and saw a person trespassing along the tracks north of the railroad intersection with Cliffside Drive. BNSF police contacted the Whatcom County Sheriff's Office to investigate.



Deputies found Brooks and Reiche in the area. The pair attempted to run, but stopped when deputies ordered them to and they were detained for trespassing on railroad property, according to federal court records.



Deputies later located a wire shunt between the tracks in the area where Brooks and Reiche were seen. A bag that Reiche was carrying also was found, which contained rubber gloves, a piece of black insulated copper wire and a Makita drill with a wheel-shaped brush attachment, according to court records.



The wire found in the bag was similar to the wire used in shunting incidents, according to the release.



A train carrying crude oil and other cargo was scheduled to come through the area where Reiche and Brooks placed the shunt soon after the incident, the release states.



'Reiche "disrupted the signal system designed to stop trains from crashing into each other or crashing into cars ... A car driving through the intersection (near the shunt) would not have warning that a train was coming,"' Assistant United States Attorney Sok Jiang told the jury in her closing argument, the release states.



Other shunting incidents



Since Jan. 19 of 2020, there have been at least 41 similar attacks along BNSF track in Whatcom and Skagit counties where shunts have been placed, according to previous reporting in The Herald and several Department of Justice releases. The FBI's Joint Terrorism Task Force has been investigating the incidents since the first attack in January 2020.



On 10 occasions, shunts were placed in areas that disrupt crossing guards where tracks cross streets, the release states. And on Oct. 11, 2020, multiple shunts were placed in three different locations in Whatcom and Skagit counties. The shunts triggered an automatic braking system on a train, which was carrying hazardous and combustible material, and caused a portion of the train to decouple from the engine, the release states.



Investigators believe some of the attacks on the safety equipment were to protest the construction of a natural gas pipeline across British Columbia through Indigenous land and to keep supplies from reaching Canada.



To cause those delays, shunts were used to disrupt the low-voltage current traveling through the tracks that allows the tracking of trains' location on the tracks, according to charging documents.



Reiche's conviction comes on the same day that the Federal Railroad Administration released its report on the possible causes of an oil train that derailed and exploded into flames in Custer in December 2020. The federal agency's report said the train showed evidence of possible vandalism after it "experienced a broken train collision."



While the Federal Railroad Administration said it can't be certain of the accident's cause, the agency ruled out drug or alcohol use among the crew, damage to the tracks, crew fatigue and weather-related factors because of freezing temperatures and light snow on the ground.

[edwardsutorik]

To me, terrorism is the intent and the actions taken to strike terror into the general civilian population. The Feds define it differently.

I would have had some trouble convicting this person.

I would NOT have had trouble convicting her of tampering with railroad signal equipment. I am quite surprised such a federal law doesn't exist.

On the state and local level, there's trespassing, malicious mischief, littering,.........

I do not approve of their actions at all. I just don't quite get to the "terrorist" part.



Ed

[kentuckysouthernrwy]

TERRORISM moves the headline to page 1, above the fold. Trespassing, etc. goes deep in the rag next to the canned corn ad fromSuperPro.

I find the mention of a game cam interesting.

[edwardsutorik]

Maybe there's more to it, but I'm having trouble with that phrase:

"A car driving through the intersection (near the shunt) would not have warning that a train was coming,"' Assistant United States Attorney Sok Jiang told the jury in her closing argument, the release states."

But a train WOULDN'T be coming, because the shunt would throw the signals to red.

I assume the gates were also down. And a car would have had to go around the gates. Something I wouldn't do unless I had a nice long field of view.


"The placement of shunts also can cause safety hazards by interfering with the operation of crossing gates at intersections with roadways and can cause gates to allow vehicle traffic to cross tracks, even with a train approaching, court records state."

Again, a shunt should cause the gates to drop, UN-allowing traffic to cross tracks.


"Shunts can also cause the automatic braking system on trains — known as Positive Train Control — to engage, which can cause decoupling of cars or a derailment, federal records show."

Yeah, I've heard that. But if the train was a goodly distance away, as appears to be true, the PTC wouldn't trigger unless the crew screwed up. It seems to me. They would have seen a yellow, and had time to slow.


As I said, maybe there's more to it than is being reported.


Ed

[oldmuley]

Sept 11, 2021 15:23:30 GMT -8 edwardsutorik said:

As I said, maybe there's more to it than is being reported.

If someone is pleading guilty to something, there's a good chance it was either plead down from a greater charge, or there is some kind of cooperation agreement. I too suspect more to the story.

[edwardsutorik]

Only one plead down. The other went to trial and lost before a jury.

Both have their sentencing coming up.

Me, I would point out that there was no intent to cause death or damage, and none WAS caused. I would also point out they broke the law, and maybe something COULD have gone wrong. I would give each of them a misdemeanor year in jail, and I would put them on probation for a very long time. If they EVER trespassed on railroad property again, 20 years.

I'm sure there's a lot of you-can't-do-thats in there, but it seems appropriate.


Ed

[ncrc5315]

If the shunt is placed in the "correct position", the crossing gate would have "seen" the shunt as a train approaching, then stopping before the crossing, which would have caused the crossing gates to go back up, thereby leaving the crossing unprotected. The gates won't come back down, until it "sees" a train on the move again.

[edwardsutorik]

But there has to be a train coming at speed to hit the cars. Could THAT have happened, too?

Where was the danger?


Ed

[ncrc5315]

Sept 16, 2021 17:19:48 GMT -8 edwardsutorik said:

But there has to be a train coming at speed to hit the cars. Could THAT have happened, too? That I don't know.

Where was the danger? The danger is the fact that they purposely circumvented safety equipment, with the intent that either equipment would be damaged, and/or lives would be lost.


Ed

[edwardsutorik]

Sept 16, 2021 18:23:39 GMT -8 ncrc5315 said:

Sept 16, 2021 17:19:48 GMT -8 edwardsutorik said:

But there has to be a train coming at speed to hit the cars. Could THAT have happened, too?

That I don't know.

The whole point of shunting is to drop signals outwards from the shunt. IF the guys who got killed by an Amtrak train in New Jersey a few years ago had shunted the track before they started work, the train would've seen red signals. And not hit them.

So we have red signals here. And yellow, etc. I see no chance of anyone being hit by a train. Gates up, gates down. Doesn't matter.

No danger.

Where was the danger?

The danger is the fact that they purposely circumvented safety equipment, with the intent that either equipment would be damaged, and/or lives would be lost.

How do you know their intent?

And what is the danger of, in this particular case, circumventing safety equipment? What danger was narrowly averted? Who almost got hit? What train had to go into emergency?



There appears to me to have been no danger and no damage. There WAS a violation(s) of the law.



Ed

[cera2254]

Even with a shunt placed in a crossing circuit the motion detector should be able to see the train once it gets close because the resistance between rails will change again.